Interactive COSMIC Framework visualizations and simulations for exploration and publication.
Professional Scientific Visualizations
The seven charts below present the core observational and theoretical evidence behind the COSMIC Framework. Each one is drawn from real data or directly testable predictions. Read the guide text beneath each title before looking at the chart; it explains exactly what the axes mean and what pattern to look for.
Background: The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) mapped the faint afterglow of the Big Bang, specifically the Cosmic Microwave Background, observed at five radio frequencies from 23 GHz to 94 GHz. Standard physics predicts that π should behave identically at every frequency.
What the chart shows: The vertical axis measures how much the observed value of π deviates from its expected value, in units of sigma (σ), the statistician's measure of "how surprising is this result?" Zero means exactly as expected. The teal line traces this deviation across the five frequencies. The dashed yellow line marks 61 GHz, a critical threshold where the deviation crosses zero.
The key finding: Rather than staying flat at zero, the deviation rises steadily from −0.68σ at 23 GHz to +0.21σ at 94 GHz, with a correlation of r = 0.91. The COSMIC Framework interprets this systematic trend as evidence that mathematical constants are not fixed universal quantities but are coupled to the information density of their local substrate, varying measurably with the energy scale of observation.
What you're seeing: Three mathematical constants plotted against frequency. Each line shows how strongly that constant's "field influence" peaks or shifts as frequency changes. Think of it like tuning a radio, where each constant has a natural frequency at which it resonates most strongly.
Key pattern: The golden ratio φ (gold line) spikes sharply at 61 GHz while the others shift more gradually. This suggests φ is the dominant organizing constant at that critical energy scale, consistent with its appearance throughout natural growth patterns and the COSMIC Framework's predictions about optimal information packing.
What you're seeing: A 5×5 grid where each cell shows the coupling strength between two mathematical constants, specifically how much a change in one affects the other. Brighter gold = stronger coupling (close to 1.0). Darker blue = weaker coupling. The diagonal is always 1.0 because every constant is perfectly coupled to itself.
Key pattern: φ and √5 are the most strongly coupled pair (0.9), which makes mathematical sense since √5 appears in the exact formula for φ: φ = (1+√5)/2. The COSMIC Framework predicts that strongly coupled constants co-evolve; their values are not independent but constrained by the same underlying information geometry.
The core idea (Pattern-Emergent Gravity): In standard physics, gravity is caused by mass curving spacetime. The COSMIC Framework proposes something deeper: gravity is not fundamental; it emerges from the density of information patterns in a region. Where information is highly concentrated and rapidly changing, spacetime curves more. Mass is just a special case of concentrated information.
What you're seeing: A bird's-eye view of a 2D region of space. The colour at each point shows the information pattern density P(x,t), measuring how much structured, non-random information exists there. Gold and yellow = high density (strong gravitational effect). Blue-green = low density (weak gravitational effect). The rippled, wave-like pattern reflects the fact that information doesn't sit still; it propagates, interferes, and forms standing waves, just like other fields.
The equation: gμν = ημν + α∇μ∇νP(x,t) reads as: "The actual curvature of spacetime equals flat spacetime plus a correction proportional to how sharply the information density changes from point to point." Where the information gradient is steep (bright-to-dark transitions on the map), gravity is strongest.
Background: The Planck length (~1.6 × 10⁻³⁵ metres) is the scale at which quantum mechanics and gravity are both relevant simultaneously. Standard physics treats it as an absolute floor; no meaningful physics can occur at smaller distances. This is why we cannot yet unify quantum mechanics with general relativity.
What the chart shows: The horizontal axis is mathematical field strength, a measure of how intense the local information density gradient is. The vertical axis shows the effective Planck length as a fraction of its standard value (1.0 = unchanged). The red dashed line is the traditional fixed Planck limit. The blue filled curve shows what the COSMIC Framework predicts happens when information fields are present.
The prediction: As field strength increases, the effective Planck scale shrinks, meaning the region accessible to quantum-gravitational physics grows. The framework predicts that in regions of extreme information density (near black holes, in the early universe, or possibly in sufficiently complex computational systems), physics below the conventional Planck limit becomes accessible. This is a falsifiable prediction: if TransPlanck effects exist, they should produce observable signatures in gravitational wave spectra.
What you're seeing: The universe's history plotted left-to-right, from the Big Bang to today. The vertical axis measures how "quantized" the universe is, meaning how discrete and step-like its behaviour is rather than smooth and continuous. Zero = perfectly smooth (classical). 1.0 = fully quantum (discrete energy levels, wave-particle duality, etc.).
The COSMIC interpretation: Standard physics assumes quantization was always a fixed feature of reality. The COSMIC Framework treats it as an emergent property; the universe found quantization as an optimization solution. Just as evolution finds efficient body plans, the universe's information processing "discovered" that discrete energy levels are more efficient than continuous ones. The steep rise corresponds to the phase transition at 61 GHz, after which discrete structure locked in.
What you're seeing: Each dot is a quantum energy level (ground state, first excited state, second, etc.). The horizontal axis is the energy of that level; higher levels sit further right. The vertical axis shows the information-processing efficiency of that level: how effectively an electron at that energy can participate in information transfer.
The key insight: Efficiency drops as energy increases. The ground state (leftmost dot) is the most efficient information processor, which is precisely why electrons fall back to it naturally. In the COSMIC Framework, "relaxing to the ground state" is not just energy minimization; it is the universe optimizing its information processing. Quantum mechanics is an efficiency algorithm.
Background: Einstein's famous equation E = mc² tells us how much energy is locked in mass. The COSMIC Framework proposes a parallel equation: E = Ic², where I is the information content of a system. Together they constitute the full energy budget of any physical process.
What the chart shows: Two properties: entropy change (ΔS, how much disorder increases) and energy efficiency, across three processes: standard metabolism (burning food for heat), information processing (thinking, signalling), and the net system combining both. The two bar shades distinguish entropy change from efficiency.
The key finding: Standard metabolism creates entropy, increasing disorder (positive ΔS, red). Information processing decreases entropy (negative ΔS, green), creating local order. The net system sits in between, with the information term partially offsetting the thermodynamic cost. This is why complex information-processing systems (brains, ecosystems, galaxies) can sustain highly ordered structures far longer than thermodynamics alone would predict.
Background: At scales of hundreds of millions of light-years, matter in the universe is not randomly scattered. It is organized into a "cosmic web," comprising vast sheets and filaments of galaxies surrounding enormous empty voids. This structure emerged from quantum fluctuations in the early universe, amplified over 13.8 billion years by gravity.
What you're seeing: Gold dots represent galaxy clusters, the densest nodes of the cosmic web, each containing hundreds to thousands of galaxies. Blue lines are the dark-matter filaments connecting them, channelling matter and energy between clusters across hundreds of millions of light-years. The empty regions between lines are cosmic voids, regions almost devoid of matter.
The striking parallel: When neuroscientists map the connectivity of neurons in the brain, the resulting network looks statistically almost identical to this map, with dense nodes, connecting filaments, and empty spaces in the same proportions. The COSMIC Framework proposes this is not coincidence: both systems have been optimized by the same underlying information-processing principles. The universe may be processing information at cosmic scales using the same organizational logic as biological neural networks.
Real-time interactive: drag to orbit · pinch to zoom on mobile